Someone who possibly teaches / will teach data science/statistics.
You can have 0 publications or 3422429406 publications in statistics and data science education.
Someone who is respectful of others in the statistics and data science education community.
Chat Drop
Location
Institution
Outline of the Session
Activity
Time
Past
Share Research Findings
15 min
Present
Small Group Discussions in Breakout Rooms
30 min
Present
Group Discussion in Main Room
20 min
Future
Your contributions to the field
–
Goals of the Session
Familiarize with different research examples from undergraduate data science education literature
Generate your own research ideas as well as research plan through discussions in breakout rooms
Make connections with teacher-scholars who have similar research interests
Research Study
Funding Acknowledgment
Dogucu and Medina have been supported by NSF IIS award #2123366.
Demirci has been supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye.
Bendekgey and Ricci have been supported by the HPI Research Center in Machine Learning and Data Science at UC Irvine.
Overview
What is undergraduate data science research about?
specify current evidence and knowledge gaps in undergraduate data science education
inform policymakers and data science educators/practitioners about the present status of data science education
We conducted a systematic literature review to examine this topic.
Methods
S
T
E
P
1
We searched “data science education” (in quotes) in at least one of the following fields: title, abstract, keywords.
We used six databases and included all the publications published until December 2022.
We had 197 publications at this step
Methods
S
T
E
P
2
We conducted a preliminary analysis by reading the ABSTRACT of all studies found in the previous step.
We excluded publications either due to format (e.g. poster) or education level (e.g. graduate education).
Each publication was discussed by at least two reviewers whether to be included or excluded.
We had 130 publications remaining at the end of this step.
Methods
S
T
E
P
3
We conducted an analysis by reading the FULL TEXT of all studies found in the previous step.
We continued to exclude publications either due to format (e.g. poster) or education level (e.g. graduate education).
Each publication was discussed by at least two reviewers whether to be included or excluded and reviewers tracked certain characteristics of the publications that were included.
We had 77 publications remaining at the end of this step and for which we will report the results.
Some Inspirational Examples
Different Topics
Topic
Facilitator
Pedagogical Approach
Sinem
Education Technology
Catalina
Course / Class Activity Example
Federica
Program Example
Harry
Review of Current State of DSE
Mine
In a few minutes we will join breakout rooms.
If possible, please get ready to turn on video.
If possible, please get ready to turn on microphone.
Shared and evaluated Shiny app developed for active learning lectures including data manipulation, model testing, knowledge checks, and class discussions
The main point of this study is similar to that of Song & Zhu (2016). It might possibly be of interest to those who are not based in the US or interested in comparative education.
In breakout rooms, we will generate ideas of research questions and methods collectively. If you have any groundbreaking ideas that can fall under intellectual property or copyright, please refrain from sharing those.
We look forward to reading your contributions to our field. Please update us if any of these ideas come to fruition. We would like to celebrate with you.
For after session conversations please use the #ecots-2024 channel in CAUSE Slack space.